Free Web Hosting by Netfirms
Web Hosting by Netfirms | Free Domain Names by Netfirms

Wind turbine-analysis.com logo


A website for discussions on wind turbine basic theory, mathematical analysis, wind tunnel testing, and test model building with emphasize on Darrieus rotor.

Home Intro Analyse Testing Building About

Building : Workshop, [pg2] | Pictorial drawing , [assembly], [detail1], [d2], [d3] | airfoil bending | arm vibration |
shaft
& pipe fatigue | bolt tension | bearing size | bearing friction | arm aerodynamics drag

Supporting arms and clamps drag losses

The loss caused by the aerodynamics drag force on the supporting arms was estimated with the following drastic assumptions. First, the spanwise (directed along the flat plates longitudinal axis) velocity component was neglected (refer figure below), so the wind was assumed to hit the flat plates at normal direction only. The spanwise wind component decreases with increasing tip speed ratio, so the accuracy of this assumption increases with tsr. Without this assumption, numerical integration will be required because the drag coefficient data is not constant but depends on the angle of wind relative velocity. The drag coefficients data is only available for condition where the wind is directed normal to the plates, so other assumptions might be needed. Second, the induced velocity was neglected. This resulted in higher than actual velocity, so a higher drag force was estimated.


Wind distribution along the support arms with spanwise velocity neglected

The drag loss by the clamps (bolt joints between airfoils and flat plates) was estimated using the above same method. A simple geometry and ‘equivalent’ size were selected to replace the complex geometry of the actual clamps for obtaining drag data. Result can be very much affected by this subjective selection.

Home About

Last updated at November 6, 2002
Comments are welcomed