|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analyse : Multiple streamtube model, [pg2], [code] | single streamtube | Glauert empirical formula | about Naca airfoils data | finite aspect ratio on airfoil, [code] | dimensionless analysis on Darrieus rotor efficiency |
Glauert empirical formulaA wind turbine is expected to slow/retard down a blowing wind and in this process extracting a portion of its kinetic energy while a propeller/fan accelerate a wind and transfer a portion of energy to the wind. A Darrieus wind turbine exhibits both behaviour of retarding and accelerating the wind speed. At the wind assisted side where the airfoil moves nearly parallel and in direction of wind speed (i.e. 180degree), the faster moving symmetry airfoil actually ‘drags’ the wind to move faster. However, for the rest of the angular position, the Darrieus act normally like a wind turbine retarding the incoming wind. This retardation is especially strong around the front (90degree) and around the back (270 degree) position. When solidity and or tip speed ratio is high, this retardation became even stronger. The momentum equation predicts that thrust force increase with increasing retardation (or induction factor) of wind speed. However, after induction factor of 0.5, the thrust is predicted to decrease, as shown in figure above, which is not logical. The real situation is actually the thrust keeps on increasing with more retardation of the wind speed. Data collected from wind turbines, autogiros, and helicopters (as shown in the figure above) proves that the thrust coefficient increases with induction factor in this turbulent wake state instead of decreasing as predicted by momentum theory. An empirical formula published by Glauert also predicts increasing thrust coefficient between the induction factor range of 0.4 to 1.0 with thrust increasing from 0.96 to 2.0. Therefore, the momentum equation is not applicable after 0.5 or more precisely 0.4.
The streamtube models must be modified to address the failure of momentum equation at that region. A crude approximation is made by modeling the Glauert empirical formula with a straight line between the 0.4 to 1.0 induction factor range. It has to be noted that the thrust coefficient data was very probably collected for the whole rotor swept area so the thrust coefficient and induction factor was probably an average value
References Spera, D. A. (Editor) (1994), Wind turbine technology: Fundamental concepts
of wind turbine engineering. New York, ASME Press. |
|
||||||||
Last updated at
November 6, 2002
|